Recently, the world of tennis has been shaken by a controversy involving Jannik Sinner, the current number one in the ATP rankings, and Novak Djokovic, the Serbian multi-time champion. At the center of the dispute are Djokovic’s statements regarding Sinner’s doping case and the subsequent reaction of the Italian player’s girlfriend.
The Origins of the Dispute
In March 2025, the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), co-founded by Djokovic, filed a lawsuit against major tennis federations, including the ATP, WTA, ITF, and ITIA. The 163-page document raised several accusations, including alleged favoritism in handling doping cases.
In particular, the PTPA referenced Jannik Sinner’s case, arguing that the ITIA too easily accepted Sinner’s explanation regarding his positive test for clostebol, a banned anabolic substance. According to the PTPA, Sinner was treated more leniently than other athletes in similar situations.
Djokovic publicly expressed his frustration over how the Sinner case was handled, stating:
“I have known Jannik Sinner since he was very young, and I think very highly of him. He doesn’t seem like the type of person who would break the rules. What has been frustrating for me and many others is that his positive test result was kept secret for five months.”
Sinner’s Girlfriend Strikes Back
Djokovic’s comments triggered a strong reaction from Sinner’s girlfriend, who passionately defended her partner’s integrity. She accused Djokovic of defamation and slander, threatening legal action if the Serbian star did not retract his statements.
According to sources close to the couple, Sinner’s girlfriend reportedly stated:
“I will not allow Jannik’s career and reputation to be destroyed by baseless accusations. If Djokovic does not immediately withdraw his words, we will take all necessary actions to protect Jannik.”
The Tennis World Divided
This controversy has sparked intense debate within the tennis community. Players and insiders are divided between those who demand greater transparency in anti-doping procedures and those who support the governing bodies’ decisions.
The ATP has responded to the PTPA’s allegations, stating that the process was conducted according to the rules and that Sinner did not receive any special treatment
Meanwhile, WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) has dismissed Djokovic’s insinuations, emphasizing that Sinner’s case was “a million miles away from doping” and that no special treatment was given to the Italian player.
Conclusion
This dispute highlights the existing tensions in professional tennis regarding the handling of doping cases and perceptions of fairness. While governing bodies defend their decisions, it is clear that some players are dissatisfied with the transparency and equity of disciplinary proceedings.
As the situation continues to unfold, all eyes remain on how Djokovic, Sinner, and the tennis authorities will handle this heated controversy.
